Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Harrogate Advertiser site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Harrogate Council hits back on extra housing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 August 2008
PLANNING bosses at Harrogate Council have rejected claims they want to build on greenfield land to meet Government-imposed development targets.
Cabinet member for planning and transport Coun Don Mackenzie said the council's first priority is to look to brownfield sites to provide land for housing, and he said there should be enough sites in brownfield, or previously developed locations, to satisfy the building requirements.

Coun Mackenzie said many of those sites will be so-called 'windfall sites' which, under Government regulations, cannot be used in identifying potential sites in the Local Development Framework (LDF).

Coun Mackenzie said: "I recognise that many residents in Harrogate and Knaresborough are worried that, by identifying these potential sites in the countryside, it means that they will be built on. That is not the case.

"We are determined to maintain a tight control on house building numbers and will always choose a brownfield site ahead or one in a greenfield location.

"The council's main weapon against overprovision of housing is maintaining a five-year supply of housing on brownfield sites. Currently there is enough brownfield land to fulfil six years' requirements."

The new Harrogate District LDF will gradually replace the Harrogate District Local Plan and guide development and conservation in the District up to 2023.

Instead of having just one major Local Plan for the district, the council – like all other local authorities – is now required to prepare a number of smaller plans at different times over shorter time periods.

One major element of the LDF includes the provision of land for housing, which requires the Harrogate district to provide a net of 390 homes a year.

Coun Mackenzie added: "This relatively low figure was agreed after extensive lobbying by Harrogate planners against initial proposals by the Government to build many more.

"Providing land for homes is often a controversial subject. However, this number is very low in comparison with the district's housing growth up to 2003. For example, in 2000/01 a total of 930 homes were built in the district."

He said residents' concerns about sustainability and infrastructure are understandable and he said all district councils – as planning authorities – have to be the ones to take the lead in integrating housing with other essential services, like transport, education and health.

Coun Mackenzie said the planning inspector recognised those concerns and asked the council to draw together the broad outlines of how these services will be brought forward.

He said: "The council has provided this broad outline, which sees a mix of public and private funding contributing to this infrastructure. Despite what some objectors claim, the inspector did not reject the council's proposals. She did, however, ask the council to "underpin" the Core Strategy.

The full article contains 458 words and appears in Harrogate Advertiser newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 15 August 2008 9:29 AM
  • Source: Harrogate Advertiser
  • Location: Harrogate
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.